IN AMERICA / By BOB HERBERT
New York Times June 27, 1997
Mr. Young Gets It Wrong
Andrew Young, the civil rights leader and former United Nations ambassador,
has completed a carefully guided tour of Nike factories in the Far East
and declared that all is well.
"What we saw overwhelmingly was good," said Mr. Young.
He said the worst thing he had encountered was the luncheon situation
at a factory turning out Nike apparel in China. "They were cooking rice
for 15,000 people," he said during an interview at The Times, "and that
just doesn't smell good."
Nike hired Mr. Young's consulting firm, Goodworks International, to
review its Asian factory operations. As usual, the executives at the
world's largest athletic footwear company knew exactly what they were
doing. Mr. Young came back with a report that could hardly have been
more flattering if it had been written by Nike itself.
Nike executives were so pleased they immediately took out full-page
ads in The Times, The Washington Post, USA Today and other papers. The
ads quote Mr. Young as saying, "It is my sincere belief that Nike is
doing a good job . . . but Nike can and should do better." The company
responds: "Nike agrees. Good isn't good enough in anything we do."
Oh, brother.
The kindest thing that can be said at this point is that Mr. Young
was naïve. He spent just three or four hours in each factory and even
he acknowledges that "we probably should have insisted that we bring
our own translators."
Mr. Young said he found no evidence of child or prison labor. He did
not seem to realize that those are not the problems that critics of
Nike operations in China, Vietnam and Indonesia have been complaining
about. The issues in those countries are wretchedly low wages, enforced
overtime, harsh and sometimes brutal discipline, and corporal punishment.
The problem with Mr. Young's report is that it deliberately ignores
the most egregious abuses faced by the workers it ostensibly was designed
to help. In Ho Chi Minh City, for example, Nike workers are paid the
equivalent of $1.50 a day, which is not enough to cover the cost of
food, shelter and transportation to and from work.
But Mr. Young's report did not address the issue of wages. "It is
not reasonable," the report says, "to argue that any one particular
U.S. company should be forced to pay U.S. wages abroad while its direct
competitors do not."
That is disingenuous in the extreme. No one has argued that third-world
workers should be paid the same as comparable American workers, or that
a company should be forced to pay any particular wage. Nike's critics,
including this one, argue that the company's full-time overseas workers
should be paid at least a subsistence wage for the areas in which they
live. A dollar fifty a day is not a subsistence wage in Ho Chi Minh
City.
Mr. Young dodged the issue of corporal punishment as well. He acknowledged
that there had been problems, but said he found no evidence of "widespread
or systematic abuse." Other investigators, including Thuyen Nguyen,
an American businessman who founded a group called Vietnam Labor Watch,
have confirmed numerous reports of Nike workers undergoing serious and
sometimes harrowing abuse.
As Mr. Nguyen noted yesterday, Nike has been operating in Vietnam
for less than two years and already one factory official has been convicted
of physically abusing workers, another fled the country during a police
investigation of sexual-abuse charges and a third is under indictment
for abusing workers.
Mr. Young himself spoke with Vietnamese workers who were forced to
run around their factory in the hot sun until a dozen had fainted. He
blamed the incident on the culture clash between the Taiwanese bosses
in the factory and the Vietnamese workers who were being punished.
"This was the way they do things in Taiwan," he said. "You run around
to get your blood pressure up, or race your motor."
Mr. Young recommended that Nike take steps to improve the grievance
procedures and otherwise bolster the rights of the workers in its factories.
Maybe he was kidding. Or maybe he just doesn't know that the systematic
denial of worker rights is precisely what companies like Nike are seeking
when they set up shop in countries like Indonesia, China and Vietnam.
* return to
top
|