Brutality in Vietnam
IN AMERICA / By BOB HERBERT
March 28, 1997
"That was horrible," said McClain Ramsey, the chief spokeswoman for
the Nike footwear empire. "That was definitely horrible. Nike is definitely
outraged that that was allowed to happen in a factory. I know that the
manager has already been suspended. Nike has called for a full investigation,
as have the authorities. That was just totally outrageous. I mean Nike
is completely horrified."
Cynics might say that Nike is horrified that the story got out. But
give Ms. Ramsey the benefit of the doubt. For whatever reasons, Nike
wishes the incident had never occurred.
On March 8, which happened to be International Women's Day, 56 women
employed at a factory making Nike shoes in Dong Nai, Vietnam, were punished
because they hadn't worn regulation shoes to work. Factory officials
ordered the women outside and made them run around the factory in the
hot sun. The women ran and ran and ran. One fainted, and then another.
Still they ran. They would be taught a lesson. They had worn the wrong
shoes to work. More women fainted. The ordeal didn't end until a dozen
workers had collapsed.
Thuyen Nguyen, a Vietnamese-American businessman who has been studying
conditions at factories that make Nike shoes in Vietnam, wrote in a
report released yesterday: "Vietnamese all over the country were outraged
that on International Women's Day, when most companies in Vietnam give
women workers flowers and other gifts, 12 Vietnamese women were so abused
they had to spend the day in the emergency room."
Mr. Nguyen, a partner in a financial services company in New Jersey
and a former vice president of the Bankers Trust Company, became interested
in the treatment of workers in factories that make Nike products in
Vietnam after watching a television report last fall about the abuse
of such workers.
He contacted a number of organizations familiar with the plight of
foreign sweatshop workers. And he called Nike. Nike officials invited
Mr. Nguyen to tour a factory run by one of its contractors in Ho Chi
Minh City. Mr. Nguyen accepted and the tour took place early this month.
On the surface, conditions in the plant seemed more or less satisfactory,
although the workers appeared tired and Mr. Nguyen got the impression
they were afraid to speak candidly to him. What Nike officials probably
did not expect was that Mr. Nguyen would return later and, on his own,
talk to workers away from the intimidating grounds of the factory. He
would then go on to investigate conditions at plants run by three other
Nike contractors.
What he found were the same kinds of demoralizing and debilitating
abuses that a wide array of Nike critics have been spotlighting for
a long time. Nike set up shop in Vietnam because labor there is even
cheaper than in Indonesia. But apparently not cheap enough. Mr. Nguyen
found that in some cases Nike contractors in Vietnam didn't even bother
to pay the locally established minimum wage. And even when the minimum
is paid it is not enough to cover the cost of three meager meals a day.
He found that the treatment of workers by the factory managers in
Vietnam (usually Korean or Taiwanese nationals) is a "constant source
of humiliation," that verbal abuse and sexual harassment occur frequently,
and that "corporal punishment is often used." He found that extreme
amounts of forced overtime are imposed on Vietnamese workers. "It is
a common occurrence," Mr. Nguyen wrote in his report, "to have several
workers faint from exhaustion, heat and poor nutrition during their
shifts. We were told that several workers even coughed up blood before
fainting."
Rather than crack down on the abusive conditions in the factories,
Nike has resorted to an elaborate international public relations campaign
to give the appearance that it cares about the workers. But no amount
of public relations will change the fact that a full-time worker who
makes $1.60 a day is likely to spend a fair amount of time hungry if
three very simple meals cost $2.10.
Nike has hired former United Nations representative Andrew Young to
oversee -- and presumably attempt to improve -- the conditions in the
factories of its contractors.
"Mr. Young," said Mr. Nguyen, "has a lot of work to do."
Copyright 1997 The New York Times
* return to
top
|