Nike Supports Women in Its Ads but Not Its Factories, Groups Say
By Steven Greenhouse
New York Times October 26, 1997
A coalition of women's groups has attacked Nike as hypocritical for
its new television commercials that feature female athletes, asserting
that something is wrong when the company calls for empowering American
women but pays its largely female overseas work force poorly.
The commercials show women saying they will be stronger, healthier
and more independent if they are allowed to play sports.
In a letter to Nike's chairman, Philip Knight, the coalition, which
includes the National Organization for Women and the Ms. Foundation
for Women, wrote, "While the women who wear Nike shoes in the United
States are encouraged to perform their best, the Indonesian, Vietnamese
and Chinese women making the shoes often suffer from inadequate wages,
corporal punishment, forced overtime and/or sexual harassment."
Eleanor Smeal, president of Feminist Majority, a research and advocacy
group, said: "The message in the empowerment ad is strong, but there's
a disconnect between that message and the way Nike pays and treats its
workers, especially its women workers. The sweatshops, which all of
us thought were a thing of the past, are back again. And just like the
feminists at the turn of the century fought them, it's incumbent on
us to do the same."
Nike's factories have become a target for labor rights groups, which
have repeatedly said that they pay too little and force workers to toil
in poor conditions. Global Exchange, a human rights group in San Francisco
that has often attacked Nike, seized on the new television commercials
to rally women's groups behind a new effort to criticize the company.
The coalition is calling on Nike to let local independent monitors
inspect factories in Asia and to increase pay, suggesting that its wages
in Vietnam be raised to $3 a day from $1.60 a day. Vada Manager, a Nike
spokesman, said the women's groups misunderstood Nike's role in Asia,
adding that its factories in Vietnam, Indonesia and China pay considerably
more than do most factories in those countries.
"Nike has created some 500,000 superior jobs with good wages around
the world in developing economies," Manager said. "The job opportunities
that we have provided to women and men in developing economies like
Vietnam and Indonesia have provided a bridge of opportunity for these
individuals to have a much better quality of life."
Ms. Smeal said, "We think it's great they're providing jobs. It's
just that the level of the wages should be increased and the working
conditions improved." Others who signed the letter to Nike include Alice
Walker, the author, Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., the Black Women's
Agenda and the Coalition of Labor Union Women.
The coalition's letter said many of Nike's workers in Vietnam could
"barely afford three meals a day let alone transportation, rent, clothing,
health care and much more." But Nike officials pointed to a recent study
by Dartmouth College researchers that concluded that Nike's daily wages
in Vietnam were four times the cost of obtaining three meals a day there.
The letter also faulted Nike for physically abusing workers, referring
to an incident in Vietnam in which a manager punished workers by making
them run laps in the sun.
Manager acknowledged occasional abuses and said the abusive managers
had been dismissed. He added that the company's factories had passed
inspections by Andrew Young, the civil rights leader.
[ Note from Thuyen Nguyen, of the Vietnam Labor Watch: "It must
be noted that Nike has been refusing to sign a living wage provision
as proposed by President Clinton's Apparel Industry Partnership, yet
at the same time the company has been telling people that they are paying
above a living wage in Vietnam and indonesia." ]
* return to
top
|